Does Three-down-days bounce actually work on QQQ? We tested it
We ran Three-down-days bounce on QQQ through walk-forward testing and a 100-run random-entry gauntlet. 3 of 4 unseen periods positive. Beat 86 of 100 random-entry runs.
You gave up raw return for a higher win rate and a shallower drawdown. This setup is about timing and staying out of trouble, not beating the index.
Equity curve over Aug 2016 to Jul 2026. Hover any point for its value. Turn on buy and hold to compare.
The same rules, tested on 28 tickers. Edge held on 6. We ship it on those.
Show every ticker we tested
This strategy made money overall, turning a 45% gain on QQQ with a high win rate of 78%, meaning most of your trades were winners. The ride was fairly steady, as shown by a Sharpe ratio above 1.0 and a relatively shallow worst drawdown of just over 6%, which happened during a three-month stretch in the summer of 2019. That drawdown period was where the strategy hurt most, so you would have had to sit through a slow, losing patch without panicking. The entry timing is doing a lot of the heavy lifting here, since your real entries beat 86% of random entry dates, meaning the specific setup of buying after three down days above the 200-day average is a strong signal. The edge was also consistent, as the strategy was profitable in three out of four test periods, so the results are not just from one lucky streak.
Every verdict on this page comes from the same process. How we test.
Sign up free. EdgeStacker runs a fresh backtest for you, then alerts you on the Today screen when the setup fires.