Does Connors Double 7s actually work on AMD? We tested it
We ran Connors Double 7s on AMD through walk-forward testing and a 100-run random-entry gauntlet. 4 of 4 unseen periods positive. Beat 85 of 100 random-entry runs.
You gave up raw return for a higher win rate and a shallower drawdown. This setup is about timing and staying out of trouble, not beating the index.
Equity curve over Aug 2016 to Jul 2026. Hover any point for its value. Turn on buy and hold to compare.
The same rules, tested on 28 tickers. Edge held on 6. We ship it on those.
Show every ticker we tested
This strategy made a substantial amount of money, turning a starting account into over eight times its original value. However, the ride was very lumpy, with a brutal maximum drawdown of over 41% that lasted more than a year, which would have been a painful test of patience. The high win rate of 72% suggests the strategy was right most of the time, but the average gain per trade was modest, so the overall profit came from many small wins rather than a few home runs. The entry timing is a key strength, as the real entries beat 85% of random entries, meaning the specific moment you bought in was a major driver of the success. Finally, the edge was consistent, as the strategy was profitable in all four tested time periods, showing the result wasn't just a lucky streak.
Every verdict on this page comes from the same process. How we test.
Sign up free. EdgeStacker runs a fresh backtest for you, then alerts you on the Today screen when the setup fires.